ECONOMIC APPRAISAL OF MAINTENANCE PARENTERAL IRON ADMINISTRATION IN TREATMENT OF ANEMIA IN CHRONIC-HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Citation
F. Sepandj et al., ECONOMIC APPRAISAL OF MAINTENANCE PARENTERAL IRON ADMINISTRATION IN TREATMENT OF ANEMIA IN CHRONIC-HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 11(2), 1996, pp. 319-322
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology",Transplantation
ISSN journal
09310509
Volume
11
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
319 - 322
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-0509(1996)11:2<319:EAOMPI>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Background. Iron deficiency is common in haemodialysis patients and ad equate supplementation by the oral or parenteral route has been limite d by drug side-effects, absorption, and cost. Intermittent doses of in travenous iron dextran complex are recommended in patients with inadeq uate iron stores despite maximal tolerated oral dose. We conducted a p rospective study with economic analysis of a regular maintenance intra venous iron regimen in this group of patients. Methods. Fifty patients comprising one-half of our haemodialysis population required intraven ous iron treatment, i.e. they failed to achieve an arbitrary goal seru m ferritin 100 mu g/l despite maximal tolerated oral iron dose. After a loading dose of intravenous iron dextran complex (IV-FeD) based on V an Wyck's nomogram (400+/-300 mg) they received a maintenance dose of 100 mg IV-FeD once every 2 weeks. Initial goal serum ferritin was set at 100-200 mu g/l. If no increase in haemoglobin was achieved at this level, transferrin saturation was measured to assess bioavailable iron , and when less than 20%, goal serum ferritin was increased to 200-300 mu g/l. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) was used where need ed to maintain haemoglobin in the 9.5-10.5 g/l range only if ferritin requirements were met. Results. Mean haemoglobin rose from 87.7+/-12.1 to 100.3+/-13.1 g/l (P<0.001, Cl 7.7-17.9) at mean follow-up of 6 mon ths (range 3-15 months). In patients on rHuEpo, dose per patient was r educed from 96+/-59 u/kg per week to 63+/-41 u/kg per week, representi ng a 35% dose reduction (P<0.05, Cl 1-65). An annual cost reduction of $3166 CDN was projected; however, in the first year this is offset by the cost of the loading dose of IV-FeD required at the beginning of t reatment. No adverse reactions were encountered. Conclusion. Iron defi ciency is very common in our haemodialysis population, especially in t hose patients receiving rHuEpo. A carefully monitored regimen of maint enance parenteral iron is a safe, effective, and economically favourab le means of iron supplementation in patients with insufficient iron st ores on maximum tolerated oral supplements.