EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION-INDUCED LOWER-EXTREMITY CYCLING ON BONE-DENSITY OF SPINAL CORD-INJURED PATIENTS

Citation
Kk. Bedell et al., EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION-INDUCED LOWER-EXTREMITY CYCLING ON BONE-DENSITY OF SPINAL CORD-INJURED PATIENTS, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 75(1), 1996, pp. 29-34
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
08949115
Volume
75
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
29 - 34
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-9115(1996)75:1<29:EOFESL>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients are at increased risk for fractures secondary to neurogenic osteoporosis. Earlier research claimed physic al conditioning resulted in a decreased incidence or reversal of neuro genic osteoporosis. This study evaluated the effects of functional ele ctrical stimulation-induced lower extremity cycling (FESILEC) on the b one densities of SCI patients using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry ( DEXA). The study consisted of 12 healthy male SCI patients, aged 23 to 46 (x +/- SD, 34 +/- 6) yr. The patients were post-traumatic, complet e, spastic SCI; time postinjury ranged from 2 to 19 (9.7 +/- 5.1) yr. Patients participated in a three-phase training program. Phase 1 consi sted of quadriceps strengthening. Phase 2 consisted of progressive seq uential stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteal muscles, ac hieving a rhythmical pedaling motion on the REGYS I ergometer. Phase 3 a consisted of 30-min FESILEC sessions. DEXAs were done at baseline an d at completion of Phase 3a and Phase 3b. Bone densities were done of the lumbar spine levels 2-4 (L2-4), bilateral trochanters (T), Ward's triangles (WT), and femoral necks (FN). Baseline bone density indicate d no difference between L2-4 of ambulatory males and SCI males. Baseli ne values obtained for T, WT, and FN were, respectively, 71, 82, and 7 9% of ambulatory values, Results after completion of the Phase 3a trai ning program indicated no statistically significant difference compare d with baseline values. There was, however, a positive trend in the lu mbar spine post-Phase 3a (L2-4, P = 0.056). Eight patients continued t he exercise program, using a combination of upper and lower extremity cycling (Phase 3b) for a longer period of time (25 +/- 9 wk). DEXAs do ne after Phase 3b indicated no change relative to baseline data or dat a post-Phase 3a. In conclusion, although FESILEC did not significantly increase bone density in the hip parameters of chronic SCI patients, a positive trend was observed in the lumbar spine. Further research wi th acute intervention, such as FESILEC during the first few months pos t-SCI, is warranted to further evaluate a treatment regimen to prevent or reduce neurogenic osteopenia.