Knowledge of the pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease has advance
d in parallel with awareness of the significant limitations inherent i
n clinical assessment. Biochemical assays, long established as the mos
t reliable means of detecting myocardial injury; have improved signifi
cantly. Creatine kinase MB, now optimally measured by the newer mass m
onoclonal antibody assays, and also measurement of the cardiac troponi
ns objectively identify adverse prognosis. Cardiac troponin I appears
to have significant advantages over other markers and may be come the
assay of choice. This is attributable to the confirmation of cardiospe
cificity claims regarding this marker. These assays permit increased a
ppreciation of the continuous spectrum of ischemic myocardial injury,
earlier diagnosis, refinement of the clinical assessment of risk, and
evaluation of alternative treatment regimens. Reassessment of the inco
rporation of biochemical indicators for thrombolytic therapy can be an
ticipated. This paper integrates the clinical and biochemical literatu
re in reviewing these concepts.