Hg. Thomson et A. Correa, UNILATERAL MICROTIA RECONSTRUCTION - IS THE POSITION SYMMETRICAL, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 92(5), 1993, pp. 852-857
A method of analyzing the head position of the reconstructed unilatera
l microtic ear relative to the normal side was developed and applied i
n the assessment of 78 microtic ear reconstructions. Two groups of pat
ients were assessed. Group I included 58 unilateral microtia patients,
some with no clinical evidence of lateral facial dysplasia and others
with mild to moderate lateral facial dysplasia, as judged by three ex
perienced clinical observers. Group II included 20 unilateral microtia
patients with severe lateral facial dysplasia involvement. Of special
interest was evidence of lateral facial dysplasia in 88 percent of th
e patients reviewed. A reproducible technique was developed to assess
the position of the reconstructed ear. Three slides showing the normal
ear, reconstructed ear, and anteroposterior views of each patient wer
e projected onto a centimeter grid to provide life-size (5-cm) proport
ions. The normal side served as the control. Length, angulation, and h
eight were compared between normal and reconstructed ears by using a c
lear film rhomboid pattern designed by choosing specific reproducible
landmarks. In group I, the reconstructed ear was of acceptable length
and angulation in 91 and 95 percent of the patients, respectively, and
of proper height in 88 percent. The corresponding values in group II
were 90, 95, and 90 percent. Efforts should be made at the time of ori
ginal surgery to ensure that the reconstructed ear is not only aesthet
ically pleasing but also positioned correctly. The technique used by u
s is one example of an attempt to evaluate the resultant ear position
in microtia reconstruction.