Jj. Disa et al., A COMPARISON OF OBSIDIAN AND SURGICAL STEEL SCALPEL WOUND-HEALING IN RATS, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 92(5), 1993, pp. 884-887
There are several anecdotal clinical articles claiming wound healing a
nd scar superiority using obsidian (volcanic glass) scalpels. In order
to determine if skin incisions made with obsidian were superior to th
ose made with standard surgical steel, wound tensile strength, scar wi
dth, and histology were assessed in 40 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats.
Each rat received two parallel 8-cm dorsal skin incisions, one with a
n obsidian scalpel and the other with a surgical steel scalpel (no. 15
blade). Data were analyzed by ANOVA. Tensile strength of the two woun
d types was not different at 7, 14, 21, and 42 days. Scar width, howev
er, was significantly less in the obsidian wounds at 7, 10, and 14 day
s (p < 0.005). At 21 days, scar width was not different in the two gro
ups. At 42 days, all wounds were barely detectable, thus precluding sc
ar width analysis. A blinded histologic review suggested that obsidian
wounds contained fewer inflammatory cells and less granulation tissue
at 7 days.