K. Nishimura et al., EXPRESSION OF THE PUF OPERON IN AN AEROBIC PHOTOSYNTHETIC BACTERIUM, ROSEOBACTER-DENITRIFICANS, Plant and Cell Physiology, 37(2), 1996, pp. 153-159
The effects of oxygen and light on the expression of the puf operon we
re investigated in Roseobacter denitrificans in a comparison with thos
e in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. In darkness, the levels of the total puf
mRNA in Ros.denitrificans were about 1.3 times those in Rb.sphaeroide
s at low concentrations of oxygen, reflecting the accumulation of bact
eriochlorophyll and carotenoids. The oxygen tension, up to 94% saturat
ion of dissolved oxygen, did not affect the levels of the total puf tr
anscripts in Ros.denitrificans, whereas those in Rb.sphaeroides were r
educed to 55% of the maximum level even at 50% saturation. Four puf-sp
ecific transcripts were detected: a 0.5-kb transcript was the most abu
ndant; 1.2-kb and 1.9-kb transcripts accumulated at low levels; and a
3.5-kb transcript accumulated at very low levels under all conditions
tested. The levels of the individual transcripts were barely affected
by molecular oxygen, An S-1 nuclease protection assay revealed that th
e 0.5-kb transcript encoded the LHI-alpha and LHI-beta subunits (pufBA
), the 1.2-kb transcript encoded pufBA and part of pufL, and the 1.9-k
b transcript encoded pufBAL and part of pufM. It was not clear whether
the 3.5-kb transcript encoded the entire pufBALM and the gene for the
polypeptide moiety of cytochrome c, The difference in levels between
the 0.5-kb transcript and the other transcripts (1.2 kb, 1.9 kb, and 3
.5 kb) was presumed to be due to the presence of several stem-loop str
uctures at the 3' terminus of the 0.5-kb transcript which acted as ter
minators of transcription and, possibly, as protection against nucleol
ytic digestion. Light inhibited the expression of the puf operon in Re
s. denitrificans more effectively than that in Rb. sphaeroides, The in
sensitivity to oxygen, as well as the sensitivity to light, of the exp
ression of the puf operon in Ros. denitrificans, which was different f
rom that in Rb.sphaeroides, seemed to represent a mode of adaptation t
hat allowed the former cells to avoid photodynamic damage by light und
er highly aerobic conditions.