PURPOSE: Most uveitis case series have come from tertiary care centers
, and the relative frequencies of disorders they report may reflect re
ferral bias. We sought information about the types of uveitis encounte
red in the general practice of ophthalmology. METHODS: We prospectivel
y examined 213 con secutive cases of general uveitis, defined as intra
ocular inflammation other than cytomegalovirus retinopathy, seen by a
group of community-based comprehensive ophthalmologists. This group of
cases was compared with 213 consecutive cases of general uveitis exam
ined by a uveitis specialist at a university referral center in the sa
me community. All cases were categorized by anatomic site of inflammat
ion and disease course, and, if possible, they were assigned a specifi
c diagnosis. Cases of cytomegalovirus retinopathy and masquerade syndr
ome seen during the same intervals were recorded separately. RESULTS:
The distribution of general uveitis cases by anatomic site of disease
was significantly different between the community-based practices (ant
erior, 90.6%; intermediate, 1.4%; posterior, 4.7%; panuveitis, 1.4%) a
nd the university referral practice (anterior, 60.6%; intermediate, 12
.2%; posterior, 14.6%; panuveitis, 9.4 %; P < .00005). A cause or clin
ical syndrome could be assigned to 47.4% of cases in the community-bas
ed practices, and to 57.8% of cases in the university referral practic
e (P = .03). HLA-B27-associated anterior uveitis, cytomegalovirus reti
nopathy, and toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis were among the five most co
mmon forms of uveitis in both practice settings. CONCLUSION: The relat
ive frequencies with which various forms of uveitis are seen in a tert
iary referral center do not necessarily reflect the experience of opht
halmologists from the community in which the center is located. Anteri
or uveitis and disorders of sudden onset constitute a greater proporti
on of cases seen by community based comprehensive ophthalmologists.