B. Weekes et M. Coltheart, SURFACE DYSLEXIA AND SURFACE DYSGRAPHIA - TREATMENT STUDIES AND THEIRTHEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS, Cognitive neuropsychology, 13(2), 1996, pp. 277-315
We report studies of a patient with acquired surface dyslexia and dysg
raphia. His reading impairment was treated using the methods previousl
y reported to be successful for surface dyslexia by Byng and Coltheart
(1986); these methods were also successful with our patient. In addit
ion, we observed, as Byng and Coltheart did, that when these methods a
re used there is incomplete but significant generalisation to the read
ing of untreated words. Connectionist simulations of the effects of da
mage to the language-processing system have taken this generalisation
effect to be evidence that words are represented in a distributed fash
ion in that system; we challenge this inference, on the basis of data
from our and Byng and Coltheart's patient. Our patient's spelling impa
irment was treated using the methods previously reported to be success
ful for surface dysgraphia by Behrmann (1987); these methods were also
successful for our patient, and we found in addition, as did Behrmann
, that the treatment effects upon spelling did not generalise to the s
pelling of untreated words. We consider the implications of our result
s for the theoretical issue of whether lexical reading and lexical spe
lling depend upon a common orthographic lexicon or upon separate input
and output orthographic lexicons. Although our results were not entir
ely unequivocal in relaton to this issue, we interpret the evidence fr
om our patient, and from analyses we report of data from the surface d
yslexic and surface dysgraphic patient described by Behrmann and Bub (
1992), as favouring the two-lexicon view.