Ja. Martinezmenarguez et al., EVIDENCE FOR A NONLYSOSOMAL ORIGIN OF THE ACROSOME, The Journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry, 44(4), 1996, pp. 313-320
We studied the biogenesis of the acrosome in sperm cells in immunogold
-labeled ultrathin cryosections of rat testis, using a variety of anti
bodies against endosomal/lysosomal marker protein and acrosin, the maj
or secretory protein of sperm cells. As expected, acrosomes and proacr
osomal vesicles in the trans-Golgi region contained abundant acrosin.
Rat lysosomal membrane glycoprotein (lgp) 120 and mouse lysosome-assoc
iated membrane protein-1 were not detectable in the acrosomal membrane
. Similarly, the late endosomal markers cation-dependent and -independ
ent mannose 6-phosphate receptors were absent from the acrosome and pr
oacrosomal vesicles. Therefore, acrosomes do not exhibit these endosom
al/lysosomal features. Apart from (pro) acrosomal vesicles, both sperm
atocytes and spermatids contained classical lysosomes (positive for ra
t lgp 120, mouse lysosome-associated membrane protein-1, and cathepsin
D) that were negative for acrosin. Quantitative analysis of the immun
ogold labeling showed that spermatocytes express more mannose 6-phosph
ate receptors and lgp 120 than spermatids, whereas the opposite situat
ion existed for acrosin. These data indicate differential synthetic ac
tivity of lysosomal and acrosomal constituents in different states of
sperm differentiation. Together, our observations argue against a lyso
somal/endosomal origin of the acrosome.