RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CLEMASTINE FUMARATE FOR TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL RHINOVIRUS COLDS

Citation
Jm. Gwaltney et al., RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CLEMASTINE FUMARATE FOR TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL RHINOVIRUS COLDS, Clinical infectious diseases, 22(4), 1996, pp. 656-662
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,Immunology,"Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
10584838
Volume
22
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
656 - 662
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-4838(1996)22:4<656:RCTOCF>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
We used a rhinovirus challenge model to test the therapeutic efficacy of clemastine fumarate for reducing sneezing and nasal secretion in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Clemastine fumarate (1.34 mg) or placebo was administered at 8 A.M. and 8 P.M. for 4 days, beginnin g 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, and 60 hours after viral challenge. In fected evaluable subjects who received clemastine (n = 75) had reduced sneeze-severity scores compared with those who received placebo (n = 75) on illness days 2 (0.3 vs, 0.5; P = .003), 3 (0.4 vs. 0.8; P = .00 03), 4 (0.3 vs, 0.5; P = .025), and 5 (0.1 vs. 0.3; P = .03); sneeze c ounts for infected evaluable subjects (vs. counts for those who receiv ed placebo) were reduced on illness days 2 (1.5 vs. 3.1; P = .01), 3 ( 1.7 vs. 5.6; P = .0001), and 5 (0.7 vs. 1.9; P = .03). Infected evalua ble subjects who received treatment had reduced rhinorrhea scores (com pared with those who received placebo) on illness days 2 (0.7 vs, 1.0; P = .04) and 3 (0.6 vs, 0.9; P = .04) and had reduced nasal secretion weights on day 3 (3.6 g vs. 6.3 g; P = .03). Over 4 days of treatment , mean sneeze scores for infected evaluable subjects (vs. scores for t hose who received placebo) were reduced by 50%, mean sneeze counts by 57%, mean rhinorrhea scores by 27%, and mean nasal secretion weights b y 35%, Other cold symptoms were unaffected by treatment. Treatment wit h clemastine was associated with an excess incidence of dry mouth (6%) , dry nose (19%), and dry throat (17%).