Jhmm. Vercoulen et al., RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF FLUOXETINE IN CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME, Lancet, 347(9005), 1996, pp. 858-861
Background No somatic treatment has been found to be effective for chr
onic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Antidepressant therapy is commonly used.
Fluoxetine is recommended in preference to tricyclic agents because it
has fewer sedative and autonomic nervous system effects. However, the
re have been no randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies s
howing the effectiveness of antidepressant therapy in CFS. We have car
ried out such a study to assess the effect of fluoxetine in depressed
and non-depressed CFS patients. Methods In this randomised, double-bli
nd study, we recruited 44 patients to the depressed CFS group, and 52
to the non-depressed CFS group. In each group participants were random
ly assigned to receive either fluoxetine (20 mg once daily) or placebo
for 8 weeks. The effect of fluoxetine was assessed by questionnaires,
self-observation lists, standard neuropsychological tests, and a moti
on-sensing device (Actometer), which were applied on the day treatment
started and on the last day. Findings The two groups were well matche
d in terms of age, sex distribution, employment and marital status, an
d duration of CFS. There were no significant differences between the p
lacebo and fluoxetine-treated groups in the change during the 8-week t
reatment period for any dimension of CFS. There was no change in subje
ctive assessments of fatigue, severity of depression, functional impai
rment, sleep disturbances, neuropsychological function, cognitions, or
physical activity in the depressed or the non-depressed subgroup. Int
erpretation Fluoxetine in a 20 mg daily dose does not have a beneficia
l effect on any characteristic of CFS. The lack of effect of fluoxetin
e on depressive symptoms in CFS suggests that processes underlying the
presentation of depressive symptoms in CFS may differ from those in p
atients with major depressive disorder.