Rf. Oser et al., ANATOMIC DISTRIBUTION OF PULMONARY EMBOLI AT PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY - IMPLICATIONS FOR CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING, Radiology, 199(1), 1996, pp. 31-35
PURPOSE: To determine how often emboli detected angiographically in pe
ripheral pulmonary arterial branches would be missed with cross-sectio
nal imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine of 88 consecutive pul
monary angiograms interpreted as positive for pulmonary emboli were re
viewed retrospectively to detect pulmonary emboli. Three angiograms in
terpreted as negative when reviewed retrospectively were excluded. Fin
dings of 76 angiograms in 76 patients (32 men, 44 women; aged 19-85 ye
ars) were correlated with the results of scintigraphy (n = 72) and Dop
pler ultrasound (n = 60), clinical presentation (n = 76), and follow-u
p with chart review (n = 72). RESULTS: Two hundred five emboli were id
entified. Nineteen patients had solitary emboli. Sixty emboli were in
the upper lobes. The largest arterial branch with pulmonary embolism w
as lobar in 14 patients, segmental in 38, subsegmental in 20, and smal
ler in three. CONCLUSION: If cross-sectional imaging can depict emboli
in only segmental and larger arterial branches, then emboli in 23 of
76 patients (30%) would have been missed with cross-sectional imaging.