PURPOSE: To assess the value of magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancr
eatography in patients in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreat
ography (ERCP) was unsuccessful or did not completely delineate ductal
abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR cholangiopancreatography was
performed in 37 consecutive patients because ERCP was unsuccessful (n
= 20), postsurgical biliary-enteric anatomy was present (n = 10), or
evidence of complete pancreatic duct obstruction was found at ERCP (n
= 7). RESULTS: MR cholangiopancreatography was successful in all patie
nts. Eleven patients had normal MR findings and required no further in
tervention. Eight patients had abnormalities that were detected with M
R but were followed up clinically. Eleven patients subsequently underw
ent laparotomy, three underwent ERCP with papillotomy, two underwent t
herapeutic percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (ETC), two underw
ent diagnostic PTC, and one underwent ultrasound-guided biopsy. CONCLU
SION: MR cholangiopancreatography plays an important role in the care
of patients in whom ERCP is unsuccessful or incomplete and when techni
cal difficulties can be anticipated.