Cd. Spies et al., THERAPY OF ALCOHOL-WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT PATIENTS FOLLOWING TRAUMA - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL, Critical care medicine, 24(3), 1996, pp. 414-422
Objectives: To assess the effect of three different alcohol withdrawal
therapy regimens in traumatized chronic alcoholic patients with respe
ct to the duration of mechanical ventilation and the frequency of pneu
monia and cardiac disorders during their intensive care unit (ICU) sta
y. Design: A prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical tri
al. Setting: A university hospital ICU. Patients: Multiple-injured alc
ohol-dependent patients (n = 180) transferred to the ICU after admissi
on to the emergency room and operative management. A total of 180 pati
ents were included in the study; however, 21 patients were excluded fr
om the study after assignment. Interventions: Patients who developed a
ctual alcohol withdrawal syndrome were randomized to one of the follow
ing treatment regimens: flunitrazepam/clonidine (n = 54); chlormethiaz
ole/haloperidol (n = 50); or flunitrazepam/haloperidol (n = 55). The n
eed for administration of medication was determined, using a validated
measure of the severity of alcohol withdrawal (Revised Clinical Insti
tute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale). Measurements and Main R
esults: The duration of mechanical ventilation and major intercurrent
complications, such as pneumonia, sepsis, cardiac disorders, bleeding
disorders, and death, were documented. Patients did not differ signifi
cantly between groups regarding age, Revised Trauma and Injury Severit
y Score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score o
n admission. In all except four patients in the flunitrazepam/clonidin
e group, who continued to hallucinate, the Revised Clinical Institute
Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale decreased to <20 after initiat
ion of therapy, ICU stay did not significantly differ between groups (
p = .1689). However, mechanical ventilation was significantly prolonge
d in the chlormethiazole/haloperidol group (p = .0315) due to an incre
ased frequency of pneumonia (p = .0414). Cardiac complications were si
gnificantly (p = .0047) increased in the flunitrazepam/clonidine group
. Conclusions: There was some advantage in the flunitrazepam/clonidine
regimen with respect to pneumonia and the necessity for mechanical ve
ntilation. However, four (7%) patients had to be excluded from the stu
dy due to ongoing hallucinations during therapy. Also, cardiac complic
ations were increased in this group. Thus, flunitrazepam/haloperidol s
hould be preferred in patients with cardiac or pulmonary risk. Further
studies are required to determine which therapy suits individual pati
ents. A symptom-orientated patient approach rather than one standard t
herapy should be considered.