Objectives: To determine the efficacy of tracheal gas insufflation del
ivered by two different catheter designs on CO2 elimination when used
in conjunction with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Design: A
nonrandomized before and after trial. Each animal served as his own co
ntrol. Subjects: Ten mongrel dogs weighing 20.9 +/- 1.9 kg. Four anima
ls were assigned to a normal lung group and six animals underwent lung
injury by large volume saline lavage. Intervention: Permissive hyperc
apnia was allowed to occur by selecting oscillator settings that would
lead to alveolar hypoventilation. Proximal mean airway pressure was k
ept constant. Tracheal gas was insufflated at 1 cm above the carina fo
r 30-min periods at gas flows of 5 to 15 L/min. Measurements and Main
Results: Carinal pressure, hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, mea
n arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary artery occ
lusion pressure), and gas exchange parameters (PacO(2), PaO2, PaO2/FIO
2, shunt fraction, DO2) were measured. For the normal dogs, at cathete
r flow of 15 L/min, the forward thrust catheter increased carinal pres
sure and PaO2/FIO2 by 30% (p < .003) and 105% (p < .005), respectively
. The forward thrust catheter reduced PacO(2) by 40% (p < .04). The re
verse thrust catheter increased PaO2/FIO2 by 102% (p < .001) and decre
ased carinal pressure and PacO(2) by 44% (p < .001) and 34% (p < .003)
, respectively. For the injured dogs, at catheter flow rate of 15 L/mi
n, the forward thrust catheter increased carinal pressure, PaO2, and P
aO2/FIO2 by 6% (p < .001), 23% (p < .001) and 24% (p < .02), respectiv
ely. The forward thrust catheter reduced PacO(2) by 29% (p < .002). Th
e reverse thrust catheter increased PaO2 and PaO2/FIO2 both by 11% (p
< .02) and reduced carinal pressure and PacO(2) by 23% (p < .001) acid
18% (p < .002), respectively. Conclusions: Tracheal gas insufflation
is capable of improving oxygenation and ventilation in acute lung inju
ry when combined with high frequency oscillatory ventilation. The addi
tion of this second gas flow at the level of the carina raises or lowe
rs distal airway pressure, the magnitude of which is dependent on the
direction and rate of gas flow. The beneficial effects of tracheal gas
insufflation may be tempered by the long-term effects of altering dis
tal airway pressure; lowering distal airway pressure may lead to atele
ctasis, whereas raising distal airway pressure may lead to an auto-pos
itive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) effect.