EFFECTS OF COMBINED AND SEQUENTIAL TREATMENT WITH TAMOXIFEN AND THE AROMATASE INHIBITOR VOROZOLE ON 7,12-DIMETHYLBENZ(A) ANTHRACENE INDUCEDMAMMARY-CARCINOMA IN THE RAT
R. Vanginckel et al., EFFECTS OF COMBINED AND SEQUENTIAL TREATMENT WITH TAMOXIFEN AND THE AROMATASE INHIBITOR VOROZOLE ON 7,12-DIMETHYLBENZ(A) ANTHRACENE INDUCEDMAMMARY-CARCINOMA IN THE RAT, Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 38(1), 1996, pp. 21-28
The aromatase inhibitor vorozole dose-dependently inhibited the growth
of dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary carcinoma in the
rat. An oral dose of 5 mg/kg per day brought about growth inhibition a
nd reduction of tumor multiplicity similar to that produced by ovariec
tomy. Tamoxifen (8 mg/kg per day) also reduced tumor growth, albeit to
a lesser extent than did ovariectomy. Concomitant administration of v
arying doses of tamoxifen with the fully effective dose of vorozole (5
mg/kg per day) tended to be less effective than ovariectomy or vorozo
le alone. This is likely to be due to the estrogen-agonistic effects o
f tamoxifen. Combination of tamoxifen with the partially effective dos
e of vorozole (1 mg/kg per day) gave results comparable with those obt
ained for either of these compounds used in monotherapy. Combining tam
oxifen with a marginally active low dose of vorozole (0.2 mg/kg per da
y) resulted in a minor additional growth inhibition as compared with t
hat obtained with this dose of vorozole alone. Sequential treatment wi
th tamoxifen (8 mg/kg per day) for 42 days and vorozole (5 mg/kg per d
ay) for 42 days, and vice-versa, was performed with a drug-free interv
al of 14 days between treatments. Tumors regressing under vorozole the
rapy relapsed when subsequently treated with tamoxifen. In contrast, v
orozole further reduced tumor volumes in rats previously treated with
tamoxifen. Furthermore, monotherapy with tamoxifen as well as the two
sequential tamoxifen-vorozole treatment schedules were in most cases l
ess effective than vorozole monotherapy in inhibiting both tumor growt
h and tumor multiplicity. Although extrapolation of these findings in
cycling animals to the clinical situation, involving postmenopausal wo
men, is not straightforward, these results warrant further studies in
preclinical models. Moreover, clinical trials comparing the most effec
tive aromatase inhibitors with tamoxifen in previously untreated postm
enopausal patients with breast cancer may also be warranted.