Mc. Haaz et al., IMPACT OF DIFFERENT FLUOROURACIL BIOCHEMICAL MODULATORS ON CELLULAR DIHYDROPYRIMIDINE DEHYDROGENASE, Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 38(1), 1996, pp. 52-58
In attempts to increase fluorouracil (FU) activity by pharmacomodulati
on, most attention has been paid to FU activation pathways without con
sideration of the presence and possible role of FU catabolism in the t
arget tumoral cell itself. The first step in the catabolism of FU is h
ydrogenation by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The
purpose of the present study was to test the DPD-inhibitory effects of
several agents whose use as FU biomodulators has been clinically esta
blished: cisplatin, hydroxyurea, dipyridamole, and allopurinol. Five c
ancer cell lines of human origin were used. Dipyridamole and hydroxyur
ea were the only modulators for which an augmentation in FU cell-growt
h inhibition (MTT test) was clearly evident for the whole panel of cel
l lines investigated (P < 1.10(-4) and P = 0.005, respectively). With
dipyridamole the efficacy of FU was multiplied by a factor of around 5
. Allopurinol and cisplatin had no obvious effect on cellular DPD acti
vity (biochemical method). For dipyridamole and hydroxyurea, DPD activ
ity showed a more or less marked concentration-related inhibition acco
rding to the cell line tested. Only dipyridamole produced reductions i
n FU IC50 values (50% growth-inhibitory concentrations), i.e., potenti
ation of FU cytotoxicity, that were significantly related to inhibitio
n of cellular DPD activity. This DPD-mediated interaction between dipy
ridamole and FU is a new finding that could be important for a better
understanding of FU-dipyridamole combination chemotherapy.