Ej. Mueller et al., REDUCTION OF LENGTH OF STAY AND COST OF TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE BY EARLY CATHETER REMOVAL, British Journal of Urology, 78(6), 1996, pp. 893-896
Objective To determine whether early removal of the indwelling Foley c
atheter after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURF) significa
ntly shortens the hospital stay without causing additional morbidity a
nd thus saves costs. Patients and methods For the year commencing 1 Ju
ly 1991, 119 patients who had undergone TURF had their indwelling cath
eter removed on the first day after surgery. The results and morbidity
of this group of patients were compared with those in 152 patients un
dergoing TURP during the previous pear. The economic consequences of t
his protocol were calculated using both Medicare and CHAMPUS data. Res
ults The demographics of the patients in both groups were similar. Pos
t-operative complications occurred in 5% of the study patients and in
6.6% of controls; a transfusion was required in 2.5% and 1.3%, clot re
tention developed in 1.7% and 3.3% and the hospital stay was reduced f
rom 3.1 to 1.28 days in the study and control patients, respectively,
Using Medicare data, the mean cost saving of early catheter removal wo
uld be $829 and $1406 for patients aged <70 and >70 years, respectivel
y, For CHAMPUS patients. the cost saving would be $1983. Conclusion Ea
rly removal of the catheter after TURF did not increase morbidity and
maintained the efficacy of the procedure. If this practice was adopted
nationally, the savings resulting from the reduction in hospital stay
would be considerable.