M. Cetinkaya et al., COMPARATIVE EARLY RESULTS OF TRANSURETHRAL ELECTRORESECTION AND TRANSURETHRAL ELECTROVAPORIZATION IN BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA, British Journal of Urology, 78(6), 1996, pp. 901-903
Objective To compare the results of conventional transurethral electro
resection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral electrovaporization
(TUEP) in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pat
ients and methods The study comprised 46 patients with moderate or sev
ere symptoms of prostatism and a maximal flow rate of <15 mL/s,.Pre-op
eratively, all patients underwent a digital rectal examination and the
determination of prostatic volume by ultrasonography, and a symptom s
core, the maximal flow rate, post-void residual urine, routine biochem
ical variables and serum prostate specific antigen were measured. The
haematocrit and blood Na+ levels were also determined pre-operatively
and again 24 h after the operation. Patients were divided randomly int
o two groups; the first underwent a conventional TURF and the second T
UEP using 240-300 W of cutting current, Three months after operation,
all the variables were remeasured and the values compared with those b
efore treatment and between the groups. Results The improvements in sy
mptom score, maximum flow rate and residual urine were slightly better
after TURP than after TUEP but the differences between treatments wer
e not statistically significantly different. However, TUEP used slight
ly less irrigant solution, allowed earlier removal of the urethral cat
heter, required no blood transfusions and was easier to perform. Concl
usion Although the improvements in the objective variables 3 months af
ter TUEP were almost the same as after TURP, there were advantages in
using less resources; further studies with more patients and a longer
follow-up are required to determine the efficacy and safety of this pr
ocedure.