F. Potvin et al., IMPACT OF AN EXPERIMENTAL WOLF REDUCTION ON BEAVER IN PAPINEAU-LABELLE RESERVE, QUEBEC, Canadian journal of zoology, 70(1), 1992, pp. 180-183
From 1983 to 1988 the densities of beaver colonies in traplines from w
ithin two blocks were compared. The first block (RB, 275 km2) was incl
uded in a larger area where wolves were reduced almost 60% over three
winters. The second block (UB, 265 km2) received no wolf-control treat
ment. Beaver trapping, formerly prohibited, was allowed in 1984 in 5 o
f 11 trapline units of RB and 5 of 9 units of UB after the first wolf
reduction. The density of colonies (0.8/km2) remained stable in UB, ev
en where beaver trapping was allowed. In RB a 20% increase in colonies
occurred after 3 years in units not opened to beaver trapping, but th
e numbers decreased to their former level 2 years after wolf control w
as terminated. Where wolf reduction and trapping occurred synchronousl
y, colony numbers remained unchanged, but they decreased by 30% follow
ing suspension of wolf control. We do not recommend wolf reduction as
a management tool when beaver density is high.