Preoperative hair removal has been a practice since the beginning of t
his century. Research in the 1970s and 1980s provide support for the c
ontention that the procedure is unnecessary for wound asepsis and may
increase the rate of surgical site infections (Seropian & Reynolds, 19
71; Hamilton et al., 1977; Cruse & Foord, 1980; Court-Brown, 1981; Ale
xander et al., 1983; Winfield, 1986; Fairclough et al., 1987). However
, some hospitals have continued routine preoperative hair removal long
after dissemination of recommendations against it. This begs the ques
tion, 'Why is it that so often research findings are not applied in pr
actice'. In Stroud v. General Hospital Corp. and Pollett (1993), a man
died of sepsis resulting from cuts he gave himself after he was asked
by a nurse, in complete violation of the hospital's preoperative skin
preparation protocol, to clip hair from his abdomen. The court held t
he hospital liable for the nurse's negligent breach of its protocol. T
he case clearly supports findings in the literature that preoperative
hair removal is potentially dangerous. It reinforces the importance of
strict adherence to hospital protocols which have been put in place t
o protect patients' safety.