Sb. Lee et Lj. Ryan, OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH AND SAFETY IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY - A SURVEY OF PRACTICING PROFESSIONALS, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal, 57(4), 1996, pp. 381-386
A survey was created to gauge how health and safety (H&S) resources ar
e allocated in the biotechnology industry and to help understand the c
oncerns of industry H&S professionals. A questionnaire was distributed
to ''the person most responsible for health and safety'' at 34 compan
ies; 12 commercial firms responded. Nearly 68% of the work force monit
ored did not fall into any biohazard classification. Almost 80% of wor
k involving biohazards was considered ''exempt'' or ''BL-1'' under the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification system, ind
icating that most work was performed involving organisms of low pathog
enic potential. H&S program development and administration is mature;
100% of respondents report having written programs for chemical, biolo
gical, and physical hazards. Chemical safety programs occupied, on ave
rage, the greatest percentage of the H&S professionals' time (46%), fo
llowed by biosafety (29.6%) and physical hazards (16.4%). The person m
ost responsible for H&S averaged 65% of work time on H&S issues, while
only 25% described their full-time responsibilities as H&S related. S
taffing levels for companies with more than about 100 technical worker
s approximated 1.0-1.5 full-time H&S staff equivalents per 100 technic
al workers. This figure compares favorably with levels reported in a b
enchmarking survey of hospitals. Investigation into accident rates as
a measure of H&S program effectiveness suggests that the biotechnology
industry is a relatively safe one. Lost time injury and illness rates
were significantly lower for the 12 participating companies than the
accident frequency rates in the Standard Industrial Classification cod
es selected for comparison.