M. Zoccolillo et al., DSM-III-R AND DSM-III CRITERIA FOR CONDUCT DISORDER IN PREADOLESCENT GIRLS - SPECIFIC BUT INSENSITIVE, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(4), 1996, pp. 461-470
Objective: To determine whether DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria for con
duct disorder identify girls in the general population with early-onse
t, persistent, and pervasive antisocial behavior. Method: 2,251 girls,
representative of all girls entering kindergarten in Quebec, were ass
essed using parent and teacher ratings of antisocial behavior; a subsa
mple was then rated for the next 6 years (ages 7 to 12) by parent and
teacher. At age 10 years, the girls who been rated as antisocial in ki
ndergarten, along with a random sample of those not rated as antisocia
l, were assessed for DSM-III and DSM-III-R diagnoses of conduct and op
positional defiant disorder using a structured psychiatric interview (
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children) administered to the parent
, teacher, and/or child (n = 381). Results: Of the girls with early-on
set, persistent, and pervasive antisocial behavior, 3% met DSM-III-R c
riteria and 22% met DSM-III criteria for conduct disorder. Conduct dis
order was not diagnosed at all in girls who had not been initially rat
ed as antisocial in kindergarten. Lowering the threshold for a DSM-III
-R conduct disorder diagnosis to two symptoms and adding the criterion
of violation of rules increased the rate of diagnosis to 35% in the p
ervasively antisocial girls but only to 1% in girls who did not have p
ersistent antisocial behavior. Conclusions: DSM-III-R criteria for con
duct disorder do not identify most preadolescent girls with early-onse
t, pervasive, and persistent antisocial behavior. Modifications to the
DSM-III-R criteria resulted in increased sensitivity without a loss o
f specificity.