This paper reexamines financial repression and financial dualism using
an optimizing model in which demands for currency and deposits are mo
tivated by cash-in-advance constraints. We contribute to the debate on
whether financial liberalization will be expansionary, due to the int
erest rate stimulus to steady state capital, or contractionary, due to
the effect of the higher interest rate on production costs. We find t
hat in the presence of curb markets, neither effect is operative, and
liberalization has little effect on output. Financial liberalization i
s likely to have significant welfare effects only when curb markets ar
e inoperative.