This paper shows how two strands of English case law, one establishing
liability to compensate for shock suffered by those at the scene of d
isaster, and the other concerned with physical injury suffered by resc
uers, were brought together in the 1960s to provide a remedy for a res
cuer suffering from what the law describes as 'nervous shock'. It furt
her traces the development of employers' Liability in this context, bu
t finds that the law provides few examples of the contractual duty of
employers to protect employees generally against stress that may cause
psychological injury. It points out that there is no case law on the
liability of employers for stress suffered by rescue workers, whether
professional or otherwise. It notes that law reports give little guida
nce as to the medical evidence judges require to persuade them that ne
rvous shock has been suffered. Finally, it spells out that EC-inspired
regulations could now be used to require employers to assess, and tak
e steps to control, stress to which their employees, including rescue
workers, are exposed.