PITUITARY ADENYLATE CYCLASE-ACTIVATING POLYPEPTIDE REGULATES PROLACTIN PROMOTER ACTIVITY VIA A PROTEIN-KINASE A-MEDIATED PATHWAY THAT IS INDEPENDENT OF THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL PATHWAY EMPLOYED BY THYROTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE
Dt. Coleman et al., PITUITARY ADENYLATE CYCLASE-ACTIVATING POLYPEPTIDE REGULATES PROLACTIN PROMOTER ACTIVITY VIA A PROTEIN-KINASE A-MEDIATED PATHWAY THAT IS INDEPENDENT OF THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL PATHWAY EMPLOYED BY THYROTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE, Endocrinology, 137(4), 1996, pp. 1276-1285
The hypothalamic peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polyp
eptide (PACAP), can efficiently increase cAMP levels in pituitary cell
s and release a number of pituitary hormones, suggesting an important
physiological role for this peptide in pituitary function. Exposure of
GH(3) rat pituitary cells to PACAP results in increases in cellular c
AMP levels, PRL promoter activity, and PRL messenger RNA levels. We ha
ve employed this system to further characterize PACAP regulation of PR
L gene expression. RT-PCR analysis showed that GH(3) cells express tra
nscripts for two PACAP receptors, PACAP-R-hop1 and VIP2. As the former
can couple PACAP to increases in both cAMP and inositol phosphates, w
e investigated whether either pathway mediates PACAP action on the PRL
promoter. Our observations that TRH, but not PACAP, increases the int
racellular Ca2+ concentration in GH(3) cell cultures and that the opti
mal concentrations of TRH and PACAP have additive effects on transient
expression of a PRL-CAT construct imply that the inositol trisphospha
te-Ca2+ pathway is not significantly involved in PACAP action on the P
RL promoter. Four kinase inhibitors exhibited similar profiles of inhi
bition of the activity on PRL-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (PRL-C
AT) of either the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin (FSK) or PACAP,
suggesting a transcriptional role for protein kinase A (PKA). The obs
ervations that coexpression of the dominant PKA inhibitor R(AB) comple
tely blocked either FSK or PACAP action on PRL-CAT and that these acti
ons of FSK and PACAP were completely nonadditive imply that the cAMP-P
KA pathway plays a dominant role in PACAP regulation of PRL gene expre
ssion. Coexpression of low levels of KCREB, a cAMP response element (C
RE)-binding protein (CREB) dominant inhibitor, partially blocked regul
ation of PRL-CAT activity by PACAP, but not by TRH, implying that PACA
P action is mediated at least in part by a CREB family member that can
dimerize with CREB. The PRL promoter contains an asymmetric sequence
at positions -99/-92 resembling a canonical CRE and termed here the CR
E-like element (CLE). Mutation of either the left or right 4 bp of the
CLE yielded a strong decrease in the response to either FSK or PACAP,
but not to TRH. These data imply that PACAP and TRH employ independen
t pathways to regulate the PRL promoter, and that PACAP action is exer
ted virtually entirely via a cAMP/PKA-mediated pathway that is strongl
y dependent upon an intact CLE sequence and at least partially depende
nt upon the activity of a CREB-related protein.