V. Pathi et al., THE BENEFITS OF ACTIVE REWARMING AFTER CARDIAC OPERATIONS - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 111(3), 1996, pp. 637-641
We conducted a prospective, randomized trial of three methods of rewar
ming patients after hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients under
went either coronary artery bypass grafting or first-time valve replac
ement and were cooled to 32 degrees C during bypass. No significant di
fferences existed among the groups as regards operative or preoperativ
e parameters including hemodynamics and blood use. The patients active
ly warmed with a convective (Pair Hugger system, 3 hours) or a conduct
ive blanket (electric overblanket, 4 hours) reached normothermia more
quickly than those warmed with the space blanket (7 hours). This was r
eflected in significantly earlier extubation in the former two groups:
Pair Hugger system 10.8 +/- 0.6 hours, electric blanket 11.3 +/- 1.0
hours, and space blanket 14.8 +/- 0.8 hours. Patients warmed with the
space blanket required a higher dosage of morphine over the first 12 h
ours than those warmed with the electric blanket (10.4 vs 6.5 mg; p =
0.004), which may account for some of the differences between these tw
o groups. No differences could be demonstrated between the two active
blankets. On economic grounds we therefore recommend the reusable elec
tric blanket for routine use.