D. J. Burns (1989) demonstrated that free recall of second-list respon
se terms was better in an interference (A-B, A-C) condition than in a
control (D-B, A-C) condition. This reversal of the traditional interfe
rence effect was referred to as the reverse-interference effect. Resul
ts from Experiments 2-4 in this article discounted several possible ex
planations of the reverse-interference effect, and the results from Ex
periment 5-7 supported a stimulus accessibility account of the reverse
-interference effect. That is, when asked for free recall of the respo
nse terms, participants covertly retrieved stimulus terms to serve as
cues for the responses. The reverse-interference effect reflects the g
reater accessibility of stimulus terms in the interference condition t
han in the control condition.