THE MODEL AH-RECEPTOR AGONIST BETA-NAPHTHOFLAVONE INHIBITS AFLATOXIN B-1-DNA BINDING IN-VIVO IN RAINBOW-TROUT AT DIETARY LEVELS THAT DO NOTINDUCE CYP1A ENZYMES
N. Takahashi et al., THE MODEL AH-RECEPTOR AGONIST BETA-NAPHTHOFLAVONE INHIBITS AFLATOXIN B-1-DNA BINDING IN-VIVO IN RAINBOW-TROUT AT DIETARY LEVELS THAT DO NOTINDUCE CYP1A ENZYMES, Carcinogenesis, 17(1), 1996, pp. 79-87
beta-Naphthoflavone (BNF), a well-known Ah-receptor agonist, has been
believed to inhibit aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) carcinogenesis in rats and
rainbow trout primarily through induction of the cytochrome P450 1A (C
YP1A) enzyme subfamily and consequent diversion of AFB(1) to the less
carcinogenic phase I metabolite aflatoxin M(1) (AFM(1)). This study in
vestigates the dose responsive effects of dietary BNF treatment on CYP
1A induction, AFM(1) formation, AFB(1)-8,9-epoxide formation and AFB(1
)-DNA binding in the trout model. Pre-feeding diet containing 10-200 p
.p.m. BNF after AFB(1) i.p. injection provided dose-dependent inductio
n of CYP1A-dependent ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity and
inhibition of in vivo AFB(1)-DNA binding. However, most of the observa
ble inhibition of DNA adduction (45% inhibition) had occurred at 10 p.
p.m. BNF without detectable EROD induction; higher doses of BNF up to
200 p.p.m. induced EROD >6-fold but provided only another 15% inhibiti
on of DNA adduction in vivo, When in vitro AFB(1)-DNA binding was asse
ssed using liver microsomes from trout fed 10-100 p.p.m. BNF, induced
microsomal EROD activity correlated moderately with reduction of in vi
tro AFB(1)-DNA binding activity, However, BNF treatment in a low dose
range (0.2-10 p.p.m.) also strongly inhibited in vivo hepatic AFB(1)-D
NA binding (69% inhibition at 5 p.p.m. BNF in this experiment), in a d
ose-dependent manner, in the complete absence of detectable EROD induc
tion. The microsomes from 5 p.p.m. BNF-treated trout had no more EROD
activity than control microsomes, and no less capacity for catalyzing
AFB(1) - DNA binding in vitro than control microsomes. Thus, the poten
t inhibition of hepatic AFB(1)-DNA binding ill vivo by 5 p.p.m. BNF wa
s a result of neither CYP1A enzyme induction nor irreversibly reduced
catalytic capacity for AFB(1)-8,9-epoxide formation, Direct analysis o
f AFB(1) metabolites formed in vitro by liver microsomes from trout fe
d 10, 100 and 500 p.p.m. BNF showed that low dietary BNF (10 p.p.m.) n
either induced microsomal CYP1A-mediated AFM(1) formation nor altered
AFB(1)-8,9-epoxide formation compared to the control. By comparison, 1
00 and 500 p.p.m. BNF pretreatment significantly elevated microsome-ca
talyzed AFM(1) formation ill vitro (P < 0.001), and this increase was
highly correlated with increased EROD activity (r(2) = 0.999, P < 0.00
1). Upon in vitro addition, BNF was found to be a potent inhibitor of
microsome-mediated AFB(1)-8,9-exo-epoxide formation (IC50 = 2.6 +/- 0.
1 mu M) and AFB(1)-DNA binding (inhibition constant K-i = 3.03 +/- 0.2
5 mu M). These findings indicate that CYP1A enzyme induction can contr
ibute modestly to BNF protection against AFB(1) in this species both i
n vivo and in vitro at higher BNF doses, but does not do so at lower d
oses. Instead, enzyme inhibition by BNF against AFB(1) 8,9-epoxidation
appears to be the predominant protective mechanism at higher BNF dose
s, and the sole protective mechanism at low doses, in the rainbow trou
t, These findings demonstrate that mechanisms of chemoprevention can c
hange with anticarcinogen dose, and caution that even potent induction
of phase I or phase II activities does not assure that pathway to be
a predominant protective mechanism in vivo.