Statistical properties of the bootstrap test of interior branch length
s of phylogenetic trees have been studied and compared with those of t
he standard interior-branch test in computer simulations. Examination
of the properties of the tests under the null hypothesis showed that b
oth tests for an interior branch of a predetermined topology are quite
reliable when the distribution of the branch length estimate approach
es a normal distribution. Unlike the standard interior-branch test, th
e bootstrap test appears to retain this property even when the substit
ution rate varies among sites. In this case, the distribution of the b
ranch length estimate deviates from a normal distribution, and the sta
ndard interior-branch test gives conservative confidence probability v
alues. A simple correction method was developed for both interior-bran
ch tests to be applied for testing the reliability of tree topologies
estimated from sequence data. This correction for the standard interio
r-branch test appears to be as effective as that obtained in our previ
ous study, though it is much simpler. The bootstrap and standard inter
ior-branch tests for estimated topologies become conservative as the n
umber of sequence groups in a star-like tree increases.