Jt. Gibbs et Pl. Bishop, A METHOD FOR DESCRIBING BIOFILM SURFACE-ROUGHNESS USING GEOSTATISTICAL TECHNIQUES, Water science and technology, 32(8), 1995, pp. 91-98
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Water Resources","Environmental Sciences","Engineering, Civil
Biofilm reactors, such as rotating biological contactors (RBCs) and tr
ickling filters, have been used to treat both municipal and industrial
waste streams. One fundamental property of biofilms which may affect
their performance is surface roughness, or the magnitude of variabilit
y in height over the structure's profile. This property has an effect
on the rate of diffusion of nutrients into the biofilm for degradation
through its influence on the thickness of the concentration boundary
layer. The method presented here to quantify the surface characteristi
cs of a biofilm involves the in situ analysis of biofilm surface profi
le data collected at discrete points. For each point, a microprobe is
lowered from some datum above the surface, and the distance down to th
e biofilm surface is measured at that point. Statistical analysis perf
ormed on the data set produces the correlation coefficient between hei
ghts on the biofilm surface at various separation intervals. A graph r
elating the correlation coefficient to the separation interval between
heights is constructed from many points to determine tie length over
which points with low correlation can be collected. A set of nearly in
dependent height data collected at that length interval is then analyz
ed for mean and standard deviation. The resulting statistics are chara
cteristic of the magnitude of the variability between independent heig
hts on the surface profile, and can be used to compare and contrast th
e roughness of biofilm surfaces. This method was used to define the ro
ughness of artificial and real biofilm surfaces. Artificial biofilms,
which were made from agar roughed with sand paper of varying grit size
, were found to have distinct and consistent roughness, as determined
by this method. It was useful to compare the standard deviation (rough
ness) of real biofilms to these values, because the roughness of sand
paper is easily observable, and standardized.