The influence of floor flexibility on the seismic response of building
structures is discussed through comparison of the computed seismic re
sponse for structures with flexible diaphragms and counterpart structu
res with rigid diaphragms. Case studies of three existing buildings wi
th flexible diaphragms and analogous systems with rigid diaphragms are
presented to illustrate these differences. Each building was subjecte
d to the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. The structures were: (1) A two-s
tory firehouse in Gilroy with unreinforced masonry walls; (2) a two-st
ory timber office building in Pale Alto with grouted and reinforced cl
ay-unit masonry shear walls; and (3) an eight-story hotel in Oakland w
ith unreinforced clay-unit masonry and reinforced-concrete shear walls
. The analytical studies show that, in some cases, diaphragm and shear
-wall accelerations can increase with the flexibility of the diaphragm
. Torsional forces can reduce considerably as diaphragm flexibility in
creases. Further, approximate expressions prescribed in current seismi
c codes can underestimate the period of vibration of systems with flex
ible diaphragms.