Mz. Hui et al., EXPRESSION OF TISSUE NONSPECIFIC ALKALINE-PHOSPHATASE STIMULATES DIFFERENTIATED BEHAVIOR IN SPECIFIC TRANSFORMED-CELL POPULATIONS, The Anatomical record, 244(4), 1996, pp. 423-436
Background: Tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TN-AP) is a memb
rane-bound glycoprotein enzyme which is characterized by its phosphohy
drolytic activity. This enzyme is distributed virtually in all mammali
an tissues during embryonic development (it can be demonstrated as ear
ly as the 2-cell stage) where its expression is stage specific. The ex
pression of TN-AP is frequently associated with cell differentiation a
nd as such it has been used as a marker for this process. By employing
a stable gene transfer and forced gene expression technique, previous
findings suggested that TN-AP expression might influence cellular pro
liferation and morphological differentiation. The focus of this study
was to determine whether this was a cell-specific effect or not. Metho
ds: The effects of TN-AP on various aspects of cellular activity were
assessed by transferring and expressing the gene for this enzyme into
three target populations; 1) CHO, 2) R1610, and 3) Rat-2. The paramete
rs of cellular activity studied included cellular proliferation, cell
cycle, cell migration, and tumorigenic potential (in the nude mouse).
Cell cycle and cell proliferation analyses were accomplished, in part,
through the use of fluorescence activated cell sorting (FAGS) as were
determinations of cell-associated TN-AP activity and amount. Northern
and southern blot analyses were used to estimate gene copy number and
to evaluate gene expression respectively in transfected cell lines. R
esults: Our data indicate that the TN-AP gene under control of various
gene promoters was stably integrated into three fibroblast-like cell
lines (CHO, R1610, and Rat-2). TN-AP activity and TN-AP protein levels
were correlated to the strength of the various gene promoters, but no
t to inserted gene copy numbers. The expression of the TN-AP gene in t
hese three cell types further suggests cell-specific effects as demons
trated by the following findings. The expression of TN-AP under contro
l of a weak gene promoter in CHO and Rat-2 cells clearly decreased cel
l proliferation and cell migration. However, the expression of TN-AP u
nder control of either a weak or even a strong gene promoter in R1610
cells did not induce any changes in that cell line's behaviour (apart
from expression of TN-AP). Such changes in CHO cells were also associa
ted with a 2.2-fold increase in tubulin transcription as well as suppr
essed tumorigenic potential. Conclusion: Taken together, these finding
s suggest that the inhibitory effects of TN-AP expression on prolifera
tion and cell migration are not non-specific and that high expression
of TN-AP may induce changes in cell behaviour which may be consistent
with or at least related to induction of terminal differentiation. (C)
1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.