Kb. Huttenbrink, A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MAMMALIAN AND AVIA N OSSICLES AND REFLECTIONS ON THE ASYMMETRY OF THE HUMAN STAPEDIAL ARCH, Laryngo-, Rhino-, Otologie, 75(3), 1996, pp. 123-128
Background: The human middle ear presents some anatomical detail which
can not be explained exclusively by sound transmission (joints, muscl
es). These details can be interpreted as an adaptation to environmenta
l atmospheric pressure loads. In order to further investigate the infl
uence of these non-acoustic loads on the geometry of the middle ear st
ructures, the ossicles of animals from different environments were exa
mined. Methods: In the first half of our century, the zoologist C. F.
Werner collected the ossicles of 175 species, mostly mammals and birds
. This collection was now cataloged and analysed with light and x-ray
microscopy. Results and discussion: The diversity in size and design o
f the ossicles seems to be influenced not only by the acoustic environ
ment of the animal - the ossicles of mammals living in the desert are
relatively large, reflecting the better sensitivity of their middle ea
r for the far traveling low frequencies - but especially the bony stru
cture of the ossicles can be related to the static loads of the enviro
nment of the animal. Ossicles of aquatic mammals are more solid and de
nser than in terrestrial forms. The bony structure aligns to the stati
c load. This structural principle forms the basis of the skeleton and
muscles and can also be found in the human stapes: the asymmetry of th
e stapedial arch can be explained as adaptation of the bony structure
to the pull of the stapedius muscle. Conclusions: The anatomical struc
ture of the ossicles of human and animal origin is not only influenced
by its function as sound transmitter, but it is also shaped by nonaco
ustic forces and static loads of the environment.