Molecular data are commonly used to reconstruct the evolutionary histo
ries of organisms. However, evolutionary reconstructions from differen
t molecular data sets sometimes conflict. It is generally unknown whet
her these different estimates of history result from random variation
in the processes of nucleotide substitution or from fundamentally diff
erent evolutionary mehanisms underlying the histories of the genes ana
lyzed. We describe a novel likelihood ratio test that compares differe
nt topologies (each estimated from a different data partition for the
same taxa) to determine if they are significantly different. The resul
ts of this test indicate that different genes provide significantly di
fferent phylogenies for amniotes, supporting earlier suggestions based
on less direct tests. These results suggest that some molecular data
can give misleading information about evolutionary history.