INTEROBSERVER CONCORDANCE IN DISCRIMINATING CLINICAL ATYPIA OF MELANOCYTIC NEVI, AND CORRELATIONS WITH HISTOLOGIC ATYPIA

Citation
Lj. Meyer et al., INTEROBSERVER CONCORDANCE IN DISCRIMINATING CLINICAL ATYPIA OF MELANOCYTIC NEVI, AND CORRELATIONS WITH HISTOLOGIC ATYPIA, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 34(4), 1996, pp. 618-625
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology & Venereal Diseases
ISSN journal
01909622
Volume
34
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
618 - 625
Database
ISI
SICI code
0190-9622(1996)34:4<618:ICIDCA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background: The clinical features attributed to atypical (formerly ''d ysplastic'') nevi and to the atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome have been used in clinical practice, as well as experimentally, to ass ign melanoma risk. Little information is available, however, on the in terobserver reliability in assessing those features. Objective: Our pu rposes were to quantify interobserver and intraobserver concordances i n recognizing certain atypical characteristics of nevi and to correlat e the clinical assessments with the histologic characteristics. Method s: Three observers evaluated clinical photographs of 100 pigmented les ions (predominantly melanocytic nevi, with some lentigines and seborrh eic keratoses) from 95 subjects, of whom 85 were family members of fou r multiple melanoma kindreds and 10 were spouses. Each lesion was rate d for border irregularity, color variegation, surface contour irregula rity, pigment diffusion, and macularity versus papularity. Predictions were made as to the histologic diagnoses and presence of melanocytic atypia for those lesions judged to be nevi. Results: The pair wise con cordances before agreement on specific criteria were quantified by kap pa statistics, which indicated slight to fair agreement in judging the atypical clinical characteristics; concordances increased to moderate levels after consensus development of criteria for color variegation and assessment of macularity, but agreement on the other features rema ined limited. Whereas macularity and color variegation did correlate s omewhat with higher grades of histologic atypia, correlations were gen erally low between the clinical and histologic diagnoses. Conclusion: There is limited interobserver reliability in the clinical assessment of nevus atypia, although correlations do exist between some atypical characteristics and grades of histologic atypia. Because of the low co ncordances, the clinical discrimination of the melanoma-associated aty pical nevus phenotype should rely more on quantitative aspects of the trait, such as total numbers or maximal sizes of nevi, rather than on the subjective determinations of atypia.