J. Hartmann et al., STUDIES ON IMPROVING BEEF TESTING SYSTEMS ON STATION .2. AUTOMATION OF FEEDING OF STANDARDIZED TEST DIET, Archiv fur Tierzucht, 39(2), 1996, pp. 107-119
The aim of this study was to prove an automation of beef testing proce
dures on station by feeding a 2 component diet of a fixed amount of co
ncentrates and treated straw cobs ad libitum through an adapted transp
onder-feeding system for dairy cows. Besides studying the general feas
ibility of transponder feeding systems for beef testing procedures it
should be evaluated whether group feeding at one transponder station w
ould affect feed intake and growth performance and furthermore to what
extent the housing system (slatted floor, straw bedding) would influe
nce the testing results. In total the experiment consisted of 4 groups
of 9 bulls each with one transponder station, 2 groups on slatted poo
r and 2 groups on plane floor with straw bedding. There was no greater
technical problem in adapting a dairy transponder feeding system to t
he needs of growing young bulls. The development of a feed back mechan
ism of the straw cob supply with the uneaten feed rest through an infr
ared feeler fixed in the bottom of the feeding bowl could prevent a sa
livation of the cobs and improve the accuracy of the feed intake measu
rements. The planned fattening strategy with a semi intensive prefatte
ning phase of 200 days could be verified in case of keeping the bulls
on straw bedding. In case of slatted floor housing, however, a signifi
cantly increased intake of treated straw cobs was observed leading to
an unwanted increase of early growth and subsequently to an unwanted d
egree of fatness at the later slaughter stage. Thus the testing diet h
as to be adapted to the housing system by adjusting the fixed amount o
f concentrates. With regard to animal behaviour aspects a housing syst
em with bedding should be preferred however, the bedding material shou
ld be of very law digestibility to minimize uncontrolled roughage inta
ke. Group feeding at one transponder station doesn't have a greater im
pact on either feed intake or growth performance. All relevant rank co
rrelations were low and statistically insignificant. The observed vari
ability in roughage feed intake was at 8.3% slightly higher as observe
d in other feed intake studies based on a comparable source of roughag
e diet. The use of the described feeding system in beef testing on sta
tion has to be evaluated positively without restriction. By this it wo
uld be possible to record the animals individual voluntary roughage in
take capacity in a feeding system that simulates a roughage based fatt
ening system similar to commercial farm conditions. Simultaneously an
automation of the feeding processes would allow an accurate recording
of feed intake throughout the testing period. The examined testing sys
tem may also be applied for performance testing on station.