ANALGESIA AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECT OMY USING INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE

Citation
Y. Fuhrer et al., ANALGESIA AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECT OMY USING INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 15(2), 1996, pp. 128-134
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
07507658
Volume
15
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
128 - 134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0750-7658(1996)15:2<128:AALCOU>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the analgesic effect of the intraperitoneal topical administration of 0.375% bupivacaine i n patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to carry out a pharmacokinetic study of bupivacaine administered topically by intrape ritoneal route. Study design: Randomized, double-blind controlled tria l. Patients and methods: Twenty-four patients of ASA physical status 1 or 2, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were included . Anaesthesia technique was the same for all patients. At the end of s urgery, they were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group bupivacaine were administered 0.375% bupivacaine, 0.6 mL . kg(-1 ) intraperitoneally in both subdiaphragmatic areas and the cholecystec tomy wound, those of the control group were given tile same volume of NaCl 0.9%. Analgesia was provided by morphine PCA. Postoperative pain, assessed on a 100 mm visual analogue pain scale (VAS), and administer ed morphine were recorded 30 min after extubation, and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6 , 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours later. Blood samples were collected 2, 5, 15 , 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 300 and 480 min after the intraperitoneal admi nistration of bupivacaine to measure bupivacaine plasma concentration. Statistics included Student ttest and Chi square test. P<0.05 was con sidered significant. Results: There was no significant difference betw een the two groups with regard to VAS scores during the first 48 posto perative hours. Morphine requirements (total and at each point) were a lso similar. Plasma bupivacaine concentrations reached a plateau at 10 -20 min, and then decreased slowly. The median plasma peak concentrati on was 0.94 +/- 0.47 mu g . mL(-1). In one patient toxic concentration s (> 1.6 mu g . mL(-1)) during the first 60 min after intraperitoneal administration were obtained, while in another patient a concentration of 1,58 mu g . mL(-1) was reached twice. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal administration of 0.6 mL . kg(-1) of 0.375% bupivacaine is ineffectiv e in reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. F urthermore these high doses of bupivacaine may result in toxic plasma concentrations. This technique is not safe and cannot be recommended.