Tv. Hartert et al., INADEQUATE OUTPATIENT MEDICAL THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH ASTHMA ADMITTED TO 2 URBAN HOSPITALS, The American journal of medicine, 100(4), 1996, pp. 386-394
PURPOSE: To determine the patterns of chronic outpatient management in
urban patients with moderate and severe asthma, and to assess medical
practice adherence to the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management
of Asthma from the National Asthma Education Program (NAEP). PATIENTS
AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey of adult patients with
asthma admitted to the general medical services at the Johns Hopkins M
edical Institutions (Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins Bayview
Medical Center), Baltimore, Maryland. Subjects were 101 adults admitte
d with an asthma exacerbation from February 1992 through January 1993.
Using a validated questionnaire, these subjects were surveyed within
48 hours of admission concerning their chronic outpatient medical mana
gement and the measures patients or their physicians took to alleviate
symptoms during the asthma exacerbation leading to hospitalization. R
ESULTS: The average asthma admission rate in the past year for this gr
oup of patients was 2.5, indicative of moderate to severe disease. Les
s than half of these patients had been prescribed inhaled anti-inflamm
atory therapy. Of the patients who had previously been shown the meter
ed dose inhaler technique by a health care professional, 11% could per
form all components of this technique correctly. Only 28% of patients
had been given an action plan by their physician in the event of an ac
ute exacerbation. Sixty percent of patients who contacted their physic
ian during the exacerbation that preceded admission had no changes mad
e in their treatment regimen. In those whose exacerbation lasted at le
ast 24 hours, the average beta-agonist metered dose inhaler use during
the 24 hours prior to admission was 44.8 +/- 7.8 puffs (mean +/- stan
dard error of the mean). Older age, current smoking, and race (black)
were the most significant correlates of inhaled beta-agonist use durin
g this period. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first documentation of the mul
tiple problems in conforming with the standards of care delineated by
the NAEP as they relate to the outpatient management of inner-city pat
ients with moderate to severe asthma in the United States. In this pop
ulation of patients with asthma, management was characterized by under
utilization of anti-inflammatory therapy, inability to use inhalation
devices properly, inadequate communication between patient and physici
an of an action plan to be utilized in the event of an acute exacerbat
ion, and inadequate physician intervention during the acute stages of
the exacerbation. There was also overutilization of inhaled beta-agoni
sts during exacerbations. It is imperative that these aspects of manag
ement, for which the NAEP has set standards of care, are addressed as
part of the effort to reduce asthma morbidity in the urban United Stat
es.