Aa. Moore et Al. Siu, SCREENING FOR COMMON PROBLEMS IN AMBULATORY ELDERLY - CLINICAL CONFIRMATION OF A SCREENING INSTRUMENT, The American journal of medicine, 100(4), 1996, pp. 438-443
PURPOSE: To develop a test that will be administered by nonphysician o
ffice staff to screen elderly persons seen in ambulatory settings for
problems commonly contributing to functional disability. METHODS: We r
eviewed the literature to identify problems that reduce function and s
creening measures appropriate for use in office settings. Using this i
nformation, we developed an instrument including screening items for m
alnutrition/weight loss, visual impairment, hearing loss, cognitive im
pairment, urinary incontinence, depression, physical disability, and r
educed leg mobility. The instrument was tested on 109 new patients at
a university-based ambulatory geriatrics medicine clinic and validated
using two standards: blinded and unblinded geriatricians' assessments
. For each of the individual items on the screening instrument, we cal
culated sensitivity and specificity using both the blinded and unblind
ed geriatricians' evaluations as the reference standards, prevalence o
f the disorders, positive and negative predictive values, interrater r
eliability, and the direct annual costs of administering the test for
an individual physician's office. RESULTS: The screen was administered
in 8 to 12 minutes. Inter-rater agreement varied by item from 77% to
100%. The sensitivities of the items varied between 0.65 to 0.93 (blin
ded) and 0.70 to 0.95 (unblinded). Specificities ranged between 0.50 t
o 0.95 (blinded) and 0.64 to 0.95 (unblinded). Problem prevalences var
ied from 21% to 72%. Positive and negative predictive values were 0.60
to 0.91 and 0.77 to 0.96, respectively. Direct annual costs for a cli
nical practice include a one-time $530 fee for equipment and, dependin
g on the screening administrator's salary, between $1 to $7 per patien
t screened. CONCLUSIONS: The screening instrument is relatively inexpe
nsive and brief and easy to use in the ambulatory setting. it has good
validity and reliability when compared to the assessment of a geriatr
ician. We are currently conducting a randomized trial to assess the ef
fectiveness of the screen among older persons seen in community physic
ians' offices.