Wn. Roberts et al., DRY TAPS AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT THEM - A PICTORIAL ESSAY ON FAILED ARTHROCENTESIS OF THE KNEE, The American journal of medicine, 100(4), 1996, pp. 461-464
PURPOSE: To determine and illustrate the causes of unproductive arthro
centesis of the knee. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients were
studied who had inflammatory (rheumatoid or psoriatic) arthritis affec
ting the knees and experienced unproductive arthrocentesis during a ra
ndomized, controlled trial. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used,
supplemented first by intravenous gadolinium contrast and subsequentl
y by manual mixing of the diffused contrast to outline the furthest po
ssible penetration of contrast within the joint cavity. RESULTS: In 4
out of 5 patients studied, failed arthrocentesis was due to combinatio
ns of inspirated joint fluid too viscous to be withdrawn or to mix wit
h contrast, adipose tissue, and lipoma arborescens (thickened synovium
with fat replacement). One MRI exam was normal. More free synovial fl
uid was imaged on the lateral side. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to aspirate s
ynovial fluid from the knee is explicable in anatomic terms; in partic
ular, fluid viscosity and lipoma arborescens play a role in chronic ef
fusions. Although surface anatomic landmarks for knee arthrocentesis m
ay be more visible medially, the lateral approach is more likely to yi
eld fluid for synovial analysis in difficult cases. Internal medicine
trainees should be taught the lateral approach.