Jg. Porterfield et al., COMPATIBILITY OF A NONTHORACOTOMY LEAD SYSTEM WITH A BIPHASIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR, The American journal of cardiology, 77(8), 1996, pp. 586-590
This prospective multicenter study was conducted under the Food and Dr
ug Administration investigational Device Exemption to evaluate the saf
ety and efficacy of the combination of the Cadence(R) implantable defi
brillator (Ventritex, Inc.) and 60-series Endotak(R)C leads (Cardiac P
acemakers, Inc.). implantation was attempted in 148 patients with hemo
dynamically compromising ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VF),
or with pace-terminable ventricular tachycardia. The system wets succ
essfully implanted in 97% of patients, with 96% of implants in a trans
venous-lead-alone configuration. At implantation, the defibrillation t
hreshold was 455 +/- 94 V (14 +/- 61) for lead-alone patients and 532
+/- 40 V (19 +/- 3 J) for those requiring a subcutaneous patch. VF con
version efficacy was reconfirmed in patients who underwent a 3-month c
hronic induction study. The system successfully detected all 763 induc
ed arrhythmias and terminated 99.5% of them; after system modification
, successful conversion was demonstrated in the 2 patients wile initia
lly had induced episodes requiring external defibrillation (1 lead rev
ision; 1 reprogramming). All spontaneous episodes were terminated with
an implantable-cardioverter defibrillator. Postshock VF redetection t
imes were significantly shorter than initial detection times (4.5 +/-
1.8 seconds detection, 2.1 +/- 0.7 seconds redetection; p < 0.0001). D
uring an 8-month mean follow-up (range 1 to 31 months), 2 unwitnessed
deaths were classified as sudden cardiac deaths, and 11 patients exper
ienced a total of 12 complications, none of which was associated with
the Cadence-Endotak combination.