To assess whether dietary guidelines for Americans are appropriate for
young children, the evolution of dietary guidance, the nature of the
guidelines, evidence used to support the concept of diet modification
to prevent heart disease and the rationale for extending application o
f the guidelines to children have been examined. As health improved du
ring this century, life expectancy lengthened, and diseases associated
with aging became major causes of death. As a consequence, emphasis o
n dietary advice for selecting a nutritionally adequate diet-the prima
ry need of children-declined, whereas emphasis on dietary advice for p
reventing chronic and degenerative diseases increased. It is clear fro
m reading the text accompanying the guidelines that they were proposed
to prevent diseases of aging by reducing consumption of animal produc
ts. Critical evaluation of evidence bearing on the concept of the guid
elines reveals that there are grounds for skepticism about claims for
the effectiveness of diet modification as a measure for reducing the i
ncidence of heart disease, Also, the rationale for extending the guide
lines to young children is based on inferences from observations on ad
ults, not on direct evidence that children will benefit from following
them. There is, thus, ample justification for proposing separate diet
ary guidelines for children.