The view that macroeconomic adjustment disproportionately hurts the po
or in Africa has become commonplace, The popular media and the nongove
rnmental aid community frequently express this view in critiques of Ba
nk-funded economic reform programs. Yet the evidence on which the clai
m has been based is flimsy and anecdotal. The emergence of more convin
cing data, from detailed household surveys in Africa, provides an oppo
rtunity to set the record straight. The evidence from six African coun
tries reviewed in this article demonstrates that poverty was more like
ly to decline in those that improved their macroeconomic balances than
in those that did not. The critical factor is economic growth: the ec
onomy grew more rapidly and poverty declined faster in countries that
improved macroeconomic balances, depreciating the real effective excha
nge rate. Changes in the real exchange rate also immediately and favor
ably affected rural incomes, benefiting the poor both directly and ind
irectly. But the findings also highlighted three causes for policy con
cern. First, many African governments have yet to display a real commi
tment to macroeconomic reform; second, the poorest of the poor have no
t benefited from recent growth in some countries; and, third, the pros
pects for the poor are not rosy unless there is more investment in hum
an capital and better targeting of social spending.