K. Eeissman P",tiongannteoh,"skinner et al., ADHESION FORMATION AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC ANTERIOR RESECTION IN A PORCINEMODEL - A PILOT-STUDY, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy, 6(2), 1996, pp. 136-139
Although decreased adhesion formation is one of the accepted advantage
s of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, no prospective studies have been
done to support this claim. Therefore, we prospectively assessed adhe
sion formation following laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum
in a porcine model. Five domestic female pigs underwent the procedure
with a double-stapled intracorporeal anastomosis. After completion of
the laparoscopic procedure, 50 cm of ileum was retrieved through the
right lower port site. Controlled serosal abrasion of the antimesenter
ic surface was performed using a fresh knife. The abraded loop was ret
urned into the peritoneal cavity and the fascia closed at all port sit
es. All animals underwent a midline laparotomy 3 weeks later to assess
adhesions using a 0-3 score according to the density vascularity, and
extent of adhesions, All animals survived the study period. The mean
level of the anastomosis was 8 cm (range, 7-10) above the anal verge;
all anastomoses were intact and completely healed. None of the animals
had adhesions to the port sites. The anastomotic site was completely
free of adhesions in four animals, and only one animal (20%) had grade
1 adhesions between the urine horns and the anastomosis. Conversely,
all animals had adhesions of the abraded loop involving 60 cm (range,
40-75) of bowel and 7 cm (range, 4-9) of the abdominal wall (remote to
the port sites); no other adhesions were noted, In this pilot study,
serosal abrasion of the small bowel resulted in severe adhesion format
ion in the porcine model. However, laparoscopic anterior resection of
the rectum in the same animals was associated with only minimal insign
ificant adhesions. Furthermore, unlike in laparotomy incisions, adhesi
ons to port sites did not occur.