R. Slataper et al., COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENTS ON PROGRESSION OF DIABETIC RENAL-DISEASE, Archives of internal medicine, 153(8), 1993, pp. 973-980
Background: Given the same level of arterial pressure control, studies
in diabetic animal models have demonstrated certain classes of antihy
pertensive medication to confer better overall preservation of renal h
istologic features and function as well as reduced albuminuria when co
mpared with other agents. The present study was designed to assess whe
ther any differences exist among antihypertensive agents with regard t
o progression of diabetic renal disease and albuminuria in human subje
cts. Methods: The study was a randomized, prospective, parallel group
design that evaluated the effects of a converting enzyme inhibitor (li
sinopril; group 1), a calcium antagonist (diltiazem hydrochloride; gro
up 2), and a combination of a loop diuretic and a beta-blocker (furose
mide and atenolol; group 3) in 30 subjects. All subjects received a lo
w-salt, low-protein diet. Metabolic (blood glucose, cholesterol profil
es, and urine urea nitrogen and sodium levels) as well as renal hemody
namic (renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate) profiles and a
rterial pressure measurements were performed at various intervals duri
ng an 18-month period. Results: Both groups 1 and 2 had significantly
slower rates of decline in glomerular filtration rate compared with gr
oup 3. No significant differences were observed in renal hemodynamics
between groups 1 and 2 at 18 months. Group 3 had the worst metabolic,
lipid, and side-effect profile of any group. Reductions in albuminuria
were not different between groups 1 and 2, but both were significantl
y reduced compared with group 3. Conclusions: Given a similar level of
arterial pressure control, both lisinopril and diltiazem slow progres
sion of diabetic renal disease and reduce albuminuria to a greater ext
ent than does the combination of a loop diuretic and beta-adrenorecept
or antagonist. These drugs were also better tolerated and produced no
adverse metabolic effects.