Jt. Baker et al., AUSTRALIAN DELIBERATIONS ON ACCESS TO ITS TERRESTRIAL AND MARINE BIODIVERSITY, Journal of ethnopharmacology, 51(1-3), 1996, pp. 229-235
The predominantly developed country business principle that the natura
l resource is effectively free, or of very low monetary value, has bee
n significantly challenged in recent years, not only through the recog
nition of the accelerated rate of depletion of native forest resources
and of the space and food demands of increasing populations, but also
through international conventions which deal with a wide range of top
ics from the rights of indigenous people to the Law of the Sea Convent
ion. Australia, classified as a developed country, but located in a ge
ographic region of many developing countries, has, in the past 25 year
s, demonstrated particular concern for the rights of the people of tho
se countries, as well as for the rights of indigenous people of Austra
lia The practical international aspects were clearly exemplified in th
e time, from 1985, when the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AI
MS) negotiated, within the National Cancer Institute (NCI) contract, t
hat collections of biological samples in developing countries would be
accompanied by an agreement to provide benefits arising from field wo
rk, and from any commercial product developments, to those countries.
Australia, as a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (A
ppendix I), continues to analyze the challenge presented by the need t
o freely exchange genetic resources of common value, e.g. food crops,
while insuring an appropriate reward to developing and developed count
ries, should discoveries be made from their biological resources, whic
h lead directly or indirectly, to high value commercial nonfood produc
ts. The Prime Minister's Coordinating Committee on Science and Technol
ogy established a special working group to recommend on access to Aust
ralia's biodiversity. The report arising from the study, and other rel
ated issues, are discussed.