M. Lopezgil et al., LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN PEDIATRIC PRACTICE - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF SKILL ACQUISITION BY ANESTHESIA RESIDENTS, Anesthesiology, 84(4), 1996, pp. 807-811
Background: A prospective study was conducted to determine the rate of
skill acquisition with the laryngeal mask airway in pediatric anesthe
siology practice, The aim of the study was to provide information abou
t the amount of supervised training required before satisfactory level
s of skill were achieved. Methods: Eight anesthesia residents in their
third year of training with no prior experience using the laryngeal m
ask airway were observed using the device in 75 Pediatric patients eac
h (600 patients in total), Residents were given standardized guideline
s for laryngeal mask airway usage in accordance with the manufacturer'
s recommendations and followed a predetermined protocol for anesthetic
management. Induction was achieved with propofol followed by either a
propofol infusion or isoflurane and either controlled or spontaneous
ventilation as clinically indicated. Predefined major and minor proble
ms were documented during the induction, maintenance, and recovery pha
ses of anesthesia by a randomly selected supervising consultant traine
d in the study protocol and problem definitions. Results: The total nu
mber of problems was 189 occurring in 121 children, Fifty-five childre
n had one problem, sixty-four children had two problems, and two child
ren had three problems, Of the problems, 77 were major and 112 were mi
nor. The problem rate per patient for overall, major, and minor proble
ms was 31.5%, 12.8%, and 18.7%, respectively. The problem rate compari
ng the first to last epochs of 15 uses decreased from 62% to 2% for ov
erall problems, 23% to 2% for major problems, and 39 to 1% for minor p
roblems. The residents with the most problems in the final epoch had p
roblem rates of less than 10% after 60 uses. There was a significant d
ecrease in the overall problem rate for induction, maintenance, and re
covery (P < 0.05). The major problem rate decreased significantly for
induction and maintenance (p < 0.05), but not for recovery. The minor
problem rate decreased significantly for induction and recovery (P < 0
.05). Conclusions: This study confirms that there is a rapid improveme
nt in laryngeal mask airway skills when the standard recommended techn
ique is employed and that a low problem rate can be achieved within 75
uses, Pediatric anesthesiologists with problem rates greater than 10%
should determine if they are using the device suboptimally.