COMPARISON OF THE ABILITY OF BREAD VERSUS BREAD PLUS MEAT TO TREAT AND PREVENT SUBSEQUENT HYPOGLYCEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS
Ro. Gray et al., COMPARISON OF THE ABILITY OF BREAD VERSUS BREAD PLUS MEAT TO TREAT AND PREVENT SUBSEQUENT HYPOGLYCEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 81(4), 1996, pp. 1508-1511
We sought to determine whether treatment of hypoglycemia with a snack
containing both protein and carbohydrate results in more prolonged pro
tection against subsequent hypoglycemia than ingestion of carbohydrate
alone. We studied six insulin-dependent diabetic subjects on two occa
sions. On both occasions subjects received a variable overnight insuli
n infusion to achieve euglycemia followed by a constant insulin infusi
on(similar to 0.5 mU . kg(-1). min(-1)) designed to produce hypoglycem
ia. When glucose reached 50 mg/dL, subjects were fed a snack consistin
g of either bread (similar to 85 kcal) or bread plus meat (similar to
205 kcal). Both contained 15 g of carbohydrate. The insulin infusion w
as continued for the next 3 h or until glucose again fell to 50 mg/dL.
Although bread plus meat resulted in a more marked rise (P < 0.05) in
glucagon than did bread alone, neither the post treatment peak glucos
e concentration (73 +/- 4 us. 70 +/- 6 mg/dL) nor the subsequent rate
of fall of glucose (-0.42 +/- 0.10 vs. -0.35 +/- 0.07 mg/dL/min) diffe
red. The present study shows that the rate of redevelopment of hypogly
cemia does not differ after eating bread or bread plus meat. Therefore
treatment of hypoglycemia with a protein-enriched snack merely adds c
alories rather prolonged protection against subsequent hypoglycemia.