Br. Bird et al., CHANGING PRACTICES IN MYCOBACTERIOLOGY - A FOLLOW-UP SURVEY OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL PUBLIC-HEALTH LABORATORIES, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(3), 1996, pp. 554-559
The resurgence of tuberculosis, which includes an increase in the isol
ation of multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, em
phasizes the need for more rapid laboratory testing for identification
of the etiological agent of the disease. In December 1991, state adn
territorial public health laboratories were surveyed to determine the
methods that they were using for testing and reporting of M. tuberculo
sis. A follow-up survey was conducted in June 1994 to measure changes
in the testing and reporting practices that had occurred as a result o
f efforts focused in the disease and on laboratory improvement. Comple
ted questionnaires were received from 51 of 55 laboratories. Comparati
ve data indicate that the proportion of laboratories reporting testing
results within the number of days recommended by the Centers for Dise
ase Control and Prevention has increased. Starting from the time at wh
ich the laboratory received the specimen, the proportion of laboratori
es reporting the results of microscopic smear examination within the r
ecommended 24 h has increased from 52.1 to 77.6%; the proportion repor
ting isolation and identification within 21 days has increased from 22
.1 and 72.9%; and the proportion reporting results of isolation, ident
ification, and drug susceptibility testing within 28 days has increase
d from 16.7 to 48.9%. Use of the recommended rapid testing methods has
also increased: the proportion of laboratories using fluorescence sta
ining for acid-fast microscopy has increased from 71.4 to 85.7%, the p
roportion using BACTEC for primary culture has increased from 27.1 to
79.6%, the proportion using rapid methods for M. tuberculosis identifi
cation has increased from 74.5 to 100.0%, and the proportion using BAC
TEC for primary drug susceptibility testing has increased from 26.2 to
73.3%. By implementing the recommended methods for M. tuberculosis te
sting and reporting, state and territorial public health laboratories
are now able to transmit results to physicians more rapidly.